![]() “We introduced ROBOTC four years ago because students working with robots should spend their time learning scientific, mathematical and engineering principles, not learning a different programming language for each robot platform. I think this one isn’t in the right direction.Ĭarnegie Mellon University’s Robotics Academy announces the release of ROBOTC2.0®, a programming language for robots and an accompanying suite of training tools that are easy enough for elementary students to use, but powerful enough for college-level engineering courses.Like the original, this latest version of ROBOTC is an implementation of the industry-standard C programming language and has a modern programming environment that can grow as students move from elementary through college-level robot programming…“Computer programming is not taught at the middle school level, yet hundreds of thousands of children gain their first programming experience with robots,” said Robin Shoop, director of the Robotics Academy. The folks at CMU do terrific work thaI rave about regularly here. ![]() They argue that it should all be C because it is the language that children “likely will use for years to come” and “will help them transition to those used by professionals.” The key criteria for a children’s programming is that it will help them in transitioning to industry? For 10-15 years later? Do we even know what people will be using in industry in 10-15 years? And should it really be the focus in elementary school to prepare these students for professional software development?.I don’t buy their numbers - I’d like to see the evidence. There’s a lot more CS in high school than elementary school, and relatively few high schools have robots. There’s a multiple of that actually taking CS classes in high school, but the multiplier is not ten. “Hundreds of thousands of children gain their first programming experience with robots.” Can that really be right? Only about 16,000 students took the AP CS test last year.It’s based on “industry-standard C programming language”?!? I’ve argued previously that it is probably now criminally negligent to teach C or C++ as a first programming language - there’s enough evidence that it’s too hard for students, and we do know how to do it better.The language should be “easy enough for elementary students to use, but powerful enough for college-level engineering courses.” Why? Is it even possible to do that? And why is it desirable?.However, there is a leaderboard where you can see how your high score compares to other teams.CMU releases a new kids language for robots - in C!ĬMU’s press release about their new robot language doesn’t make much sense to me. Virtual Skills is not a competition like VIQC or VRC. However, the coding knowledge, game knowledge, and debugging skills learned from coding in Virtual Skills will be invaluable when you start coding the physical robot. Get ready to code your own robot in Blocks or PythonĬode written in Virtual Skills will not transfer over to the team's custom robot, because their robot is undoubtedly different from the standard Virtual Skills design.Testing code requires constant field reset and battery charging.The build team is always driving, changing, and testing the robot.New teams find it difficult to get started on coding robots because the team coders often do not get time to learn. Virtual Skills is a good place to get started with coding for VEX Competitions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |